Saturday, August 25, 2012

Maple Oatmeal Cake Rides Again


In his book Immortality, Milan Kundera describes in excruciatingly observed detail how an enterprising woman named Bettina engages Goethe in a protracted battle of manipulation over Goethe's image. Though he keeps control of the public's perception of him throughout his life, in death Bettina wrests his image from him, which is to say, Bettina sculpts Goethe's immortality. The book discusses some interesting concepts that I'd like to bring to bear on culture heroes. 

Kundera speaks of ideology and imagology, the second the driving and defining factor of our age in his view. Would be hard to deny him. But thinking about it, imagology as he defines it has a broader reach than these last 100 years or so. Kundera uses the dissemination of Marxism to illustrate the differences between ideology and imagology, the way one transformed into the other.

Some one hundred years ago in Russia, persecuted Marxists began to gather secretly in small circles in order to study Marx's manifesto; they simplified the contents of this simple ideology in order to disseminate it to other circles, whose members, simplifying further and further this simplification of the simple, kept passing it on and on, so that when Marxism became known and powerful on the whole planet, all that was left of it was a collection of six or seven slogans so poorly linked that it can hardly be called an ideology. And precisely because the remnants of Marx no longer form any logical system of ideas, but only a series of suggestive images and slogans (a smiling worker with a hammer, black, white, and yellow men fraternally holding hands, the dove of peace rising to the sky, and son and so on), we can rightfully talk of a gradual, general, planetary transformation of ideology to imagology…

I want to add to this comparison of ideology and imagology: ideology was like a set of enormous wheels at the back of the stage, turning and setting in motion wars, revolutions, reforms. The wheels of imagology turn without having any effect upon history. Ideologies fought with one another, and each of them was capable of filling a whole epoch with its thinking. Imagology organizes peaceful alternation of its systems in lively seasonal rhythms… ideology belonged to history, while the reign of imagology begins where history ends (Kundera, Immortality, 113-6).


I hesitate to decouple ideology and imagology, placing the later outside of history and declaring the former dead. For millennia the two have functioned symbiotically. Culture heroes provide a window into this relationship.

Tomoe, where is she now?
We identify culture heroes by their collection of attributes, their image. No matter in what story he shows up, Väinämöinen is old, skilled in magic, wise yet with some foolhardy achilles heel, can sing, and has a touch of the lech about him. We recognize Cuchulainn as young, short, a braggart, fond of women, skilled in battle, and prone to violence. Tomoe is always beautiful, headstrong and alluring, yet faithfully subservient to her daimyo. And of course a terror on the battlefield.

But no matter their image, which holds with slight variation between tales (Cuchulainn's hair changes color, for instance), the ideology each hero serves can vary widely across stories. Does Tomoe drown herself in lake Biwa after the battle of Awazu in which her daimyo, Minamoto no Yoshinaka, is killed? Does she marry the victor, Yoshinaka's cousin and mortal enemy? Does she become a nun? Does she escape to the forest and bear Minamoto no Yoshinaka's child? Each outcome serves a different conception of women's place in society and the consequences of her transgression of that place. Is Odin a petty, inimical trickster or a wise, ends-driven battle lord? Thor a cross dressing fool or the protector of the farm and family? Does Väinämöinen bring music and magic to his people, drive beautiful young girls to their death with selfish blindness or is he the insubstantial illusion of a fading pagan world? Cuchulainn: protector or brute?

No wonder culture heroes often feel like cardboard cutouts. They possess each a lovely, shiny, archetypical image, as perfect as any one of the shifting identities of a pop princess, as compelling, as gripping as the protagonist of a soon-to-be-forgotten genre novel, but their ideology, their meaning, the core with which we seek a deeper connection changes to suit the ideology of each tale teller. The hero is a figurehead for the ideology of anyone canny enough to chain their dogma to the imagological power of the hero.  

Often as a student writer, I see this mantra on the blogs of established writers and in books of writing advice - push your protagonist to the max. Make her someone readers want to identify with, beautiful, at the top of her field, hot boyfriend. What's her most salient positive feature? Amplify it. But she can't be too perfect. What is her flaw? Deepen it. Then, exploit it once, twice, and thrice before she overcomes it. She must have two needs that drive/cripple her. Two creates layers and layers equal reality. I see the characters resultant of this advice sprinkled all over fiction, and they bore the fuck out of me. They are not human. Worse, they are not subtle. Theirs is the false depth of bright water, distant mountains reflected in a stream two feet deep. At best, they offer the momentary illusion of depth that exotic beauty often creates. Just like the most successful pop star. The image is so compelling that we want to ascribe meaning. George Eliot expressed this neatly while portraying the shallow, self absorbed, kittenishly monstrous heroine/villain/victim Hetty Sorrel in Adam Bede, "But Hetty's face had a language that transcended her feelings. There are faces which nature charges with a meaning and pathos not belonging to the single human soul that flutters beneath them, but speaking the joys and sorrows of foregone generations--eyes that tell of deep love which doubtless has been and is somewhere, but not paired with these eyes--perhaps paired with pale eyes that can say nothing; just as a national language may be instinct with poetry unfelt by the lips that use it." (Adam Bede, Chapter XXVI The Dance)

Killed him a bear when he was only three.
...uh, what's he doing with bears now?
We confuse things like beauty, youth, and strength easily with meaning and depth. Even with visually repulsive characters like Väinämöinen we may become fascinated with some attribute, his musical skill, and tie meaning to this anchor. An unusual appearance--Davy Crockett's hat and native-inspired dress, Kaguya-hime's diminutiveness, Tomoe's white skin and habit of wearing men's armor--may inspire the sort of fascination that invites the attribution of meaning.

But in the end this meaning does not arise from the hero, from the symbol. It comes from the teller, the one who deploys the symbol, knowingly or unknowingly in the service of their own thoughts, feelings, ideas, and agenda. This shifting core is why heroes often do not impress us with emotional validity. Why nations, rebels, fascists, and factionists alike vie for control of culture heroes. For if the culture hero lacks inherent meaning, his/her image wields terrible power.

Those who valorize history are prone to fascism, a common saw. We have lots of examples. Nazis. Certain segments of the black metal scene. America's Tea Party. But what is this valorization of history really? The insertion of our modern ideas into a historically proven array of powerful images, that is, a repurposing of old images for new ideologies. This can work better or worse. The Nazis tried to insert their own ideas where a matrix of meaning already supported the symbols. Established symbols and mythical figures can only be pushed so far from their traditional meaning, or a deal of time is necessary to move the locus of their meaning. The Nazi's thin repurposing of northern European myth and symbol failed to take root in all but a few cases (sun and rebirth are not the associations that pop into most people's minds when presented with a swastika). 

Folk metal bands play the same game, insertion of ideas into historical symbols, often culture heroes, with various levels of success. Amorphis has played the game fairly successfully. Since taking on Tomi Joutsen as their singer, they've produced four albums which tell the stories of three heroes and one villain of the Kalevala. Eclipse for Kullervo, whose villain status is as relative as it is interesting, Silent Waters for Lemminkäinen, Skyforger for Ilmarinen, and The Beginning of Times for Väinämöinen. In the Kalevala, each hero has a collection of Runos or stories concerning him. Lönnrot arranged them in such a way as to create the impression of chronological order. He tweaked the stories to make them more cohesive, chose which to include and even more to exclude, yet across the Kalevala, many views of each hero emerge. Though transformed into a single epic text, it is clear that each runo was originally the product of a unique teller using stock characters and stories for his or her own ideological ends. Väinämöinen doesn't quite line up with himself in the Kalevala.

Väinömöinen's singing that dude down into a swamp.
Not nice. Then he goes off and drives the dude's cute
sister to suicide... Dude was kinda a dick though.
Amorphis take these characters in their story arcs and flesh out an emotional context for them. More than narrating the action in the stories, their lyrics add emotional content. Adding their take on these characters feelings while retelling the stories from a modern viewpoint creates a powerful symbol. Amorphis uses this to drive album sales and increase their popularity, and perhaps also to raise the profile of Finnish culture in the world. Of the thousand things that could be done with this tool, fine, well and good.



Then we have certain bands who invoke a tradition without fulfilling it. If you seek to use the past, you cannot ask it to remain behind you and shore you up in your irrelation to it, but must bear it before you and pour something of yourself into it.

And then, because his gravity is great, we have Joyce. Depending on who you ask, Joyce systematically reworked Irish myth in total throughout his body of works creating a new Irish identity from the shards of the past, or he just played with bits and pieces of it in interesting ways. I'm inclined more towards the later, though when we say 'interesting' with Joyce, the qualifier 'very' enters as an inherent, understated implication. In Ulysses, Joyce gives Cuchulainn such an imaginative reworking. While his contemporaries mounted the hero as the figurehead of an increasingly violent nationalism, Joyce assumed more thoroughly the style of Irish myth while utterly reworking its past imaginings into something modern. Take the Cyclops chapter where Irish myth is most visible.

I have intentionally mixed gods, historical figures, and purely legendary heroes here and have broadly related them to pop icons and genre fiction protagonists. I feel that they occupy the same mind space and serve similar functions. In a way, Thor is as real as Davy Crockett. Both serve to entertain, guide, inspire, and embody a nationality, just as Väinämöinen charms with the same tricks as Kanye West (yeah, old reference, who the hell is popular now?) After the passage of sufficient years, if the figure is remembered, all aspects collapse into the heroic.  Tomoe may have been a real person, an entertainer and political figure of sorts whose image has collided with ideas of warlike female deities and collapsed into a legendary hero.  In 1200 years will we remember Davy Crockett as a historical figure or a legend, if we remember him at all?

To paraphrase DH, our minds are a clearing in the vast wilderness of our souls through which strange gods come and go (Lawrence, Studies in Classic American Literature). Though we may ascribe our meanings to these gods, charge them to serve our causes, who is in control here? As Kundera points out, in the end the image is the immortality. Our ideas, causes, only serve these gods, these heroes, these larger than life pictures.  Our wee, drop-in-the-bucket contribution becomes only another layer in the fascination-glamour of the hero image. We cannot know what lies in the forest where they tread, what other clearings they will come into. And so, though we play with them like toys, they fascinate us, and in the end hold us in thrall.

This multilayered, complex, visually compelling cake held me in thrall!  Some words before the recipe.

This cake is a sugar punch to the mouth, and is not too healthy, despite what associations oatmeal and chia seeds might incur. It was tasty, visually impressive, and a lot of fun. Give it a try in this dinner party worthy form. Afterwards, may I suggest preparing the oatmeal cake as a simple, single layer cake with your favorite topping? The cake is moist and delicate, hard to stack and not the most suitable for the four layer shtick. The flavor is robust and could stand on its own as a simple dessert.
Sugar!!!!


Oatmeal Cake

Boil water and pour:
1 1/2 cup boiling water
into:
1 cup rolled oats
Stir and let sit until water is absorbed and oats cool.

Mix:
1 3/4 cups flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon cinnamon
1 teaspoon nutmeg
1/2 teaspoon salt

Cream together:
1/2 cup margarine
1/2 cup brown sugar packed
3/4 cup white sugar
Add 2 tablespoons soy yogurt and stir.

Mix all ingredients together in a few swift strokes

Bake in a greased floured 9x13 pan at 350 for 25 min

Broiled Coconut Topping

Mix together:
4 tablespoons melted margarine
1/2 cup brown sugar
1/8 cup maple syrup
1/4 teaspoon vanilla extract
2 tablespoons soy yogurt
1 cup flaked, unsweeted coconut

Let the cake cool.  Measure out the cake with a tape measure or other suitable tool and divide into four equal rectangles.  Put a piece of parchment paper onto a cookie sheet, and using spatulas, carefully maneuver one rectangle of cake onto this fresh sheet.  

Move the bottom layer of the cake onto your serving tray or preferred final location of the cake. Spread an 1/8 inch thick layer of chia seed custard. Using spatulas and care, lift the next layer and place on top of the first. Repeat until you have left aside only the top layer.

Spread the top layer with the coconut topping and place directly under a hot broiler. The topping will start to bubble and the coconut brown; watch closely and remove from the oven as soon as the coconut takes on that toasty look. It may take less than a minute. While warm cake is usually harder to handle, the longer the top layer sits with the broiled topping, the more delicate it will become. I recommend setting up the underlying layers and custard first, then taking the top layer directly from beneath the broiler to the top of the cake.

Once your cake is stacked, pack frosting into corners and edges as needed to get the cake level, then coat the sides with a thick layer of frosting.



Friday, February 10, 2012

Maple Oatmeal Cake with Broiled Coconut Topping

'Henceforth be masterless.'
Which is all very well, but it isn't freedom. Rather the reverse. A hopeless sort of constraint. It is never freedom till you find something you really positively want to be.

-DH Lawrence, Studies in Classic American Literature

Khyron is a 30 foot tall commander of the
Zentraedi space fleet. He likes cookies and
pop music.

When I was a kid, I did not have heroes. This made certain grade school writing assignments difficult. After agonizing attempts to relate a cast of acceptable historical figures to my very sharply realized self, I’d basically pick at random. My hero is Benjamin Franklin because he had great taste in hats and wrote the almanack. And a month later my hero is Rachael Carter because she convincingly portrays life as a fish for the common reader. Everyone from Martin Luther King in my bored-attempts-at-an-easy-A-through-name-dropping moments to Sir Francis Drake in my more random moments to Lord Khyron, the villain from Robotech, in my more cynical moments got an essay dedicated to them. I don’t know what conclusions my teachers must have drawn about my hopes, dreams, and personality.

It’s not that I didn’t want to be something more than I was. I passed through both a backhoe operator and dire pegacorn stage. I read several children’s guides to heavy machinery and tried my hardest to extrude serrated spikes and metal wings. Eventually I developed more adult aspirations - become marine biologist - and more clearly articulated goals - fill in missing pieces of leatherback sea turtle life cycle and use information to protect young turtles from waste plastic.

Goal setting!
American hero rhetoric mystifies me. We start with these essays in grade school and really develop them into an art by high school. The dude who saves a kid from a storm drain qualifies as a hero. All firefighters are heroes. The lady who whistleblows on a pharmaceutical company’s systematic defrauding of the elderly is also a hero. Why the need to venerate? Sure these people are great. Send the firemen some tax money. I’d bake the dude a cake and let’s throw a nice party for the lady. We can hand out medals and maybe have a band. Not making fun here, saying thanks with more than words is nice. But model my life on these people? That’s asking too much.

Setting someone up as a hero implies an unobtainable goal, an ideal you can always strive for but never reach. Many of these modern day heroes are situational. We can mentally and physically fortify ourselves, but few of us will ever get the chance to snatch a child from a storm drain, thankfully.

As for semi-situation-independent heroes? Well, as with so many other things, I’m only going to live as me once. While I’m alive, I may as well believe I’m fucking great. I’d rather not be comparing myself to Benjamin Franklin who, as DH so aptly put it, was “Middle-sized, sturdy, snuff-coloured Doctor Franklin, one of the soundest citizens that ever trod or 'used venery'.” Thank you DH. You are not my hero but I loved every page of Studies in Classic American Literature.

Striving for the approval of others is a sure way to be miserable, especially for my personality type, and the only way to assure that you become DH Lawrence. Of course you have to put in the work to become a skilled author, secure an agent and publication, and do a little self promotion. Then there’s luck, timeliness, uncontrollable factors. But it really helps to put on a dress made of giant plastic bubbles and go out and loudly make your fame. Notice me notice me, you must cry, and also read my book! In the current age it helps to have money and/or be sexy. Perhaps this has always helped... If all goes your way you can get a ten book deal, gad about the world with your lovely wife/amanuensis, and leave behind a legacy of classic, much read and loved novels and essays.

Benjamin contriving money out of
the Court of France.
Benjamin Franklin was canny. He knew the value of a flamboyant hat. But why spend your life trying to live up to other’s standards? Why not just please yourself. I suppose an argument is to be made for the self effacing or obscure hero. But again, why model yourself on another person’s life? Why have a hero who by definition you cannot be? Why cultivate a goal you cannot achieve?

Especially since it is perfectly possible to set challenging, meaningful goals for yourself and meet them in yourself, for yourself, without comparison to or judgement by others. Over the past two years I’ve cultivated the abilities to run a marathon and read Finnish. If I'd paid much attention to others, I wouldn't be able to do either of these things, which aside from being fun in themselves, have catapulted me into a chain of happy adventures. Give me another two and I’ll be running marathons dressed as a potato because it's just fun and games at that point and translating Finnish books. These things make me feel great and drive my life in positive directions, not comparing myself to Sir Francis Drake. Those goddamn Elizabethan ruffs look itchy and unflattering anyway.

So yeah, heroes? Products of opportunity, striving to please others, or goals you inherently can’t reach. No thanks. There is a type of hero I find fascinating though, and that’s a hero in the traditional sense of the word, a legendary, often partially divine being who does impossible things. Cuchulainn, Tomoe, Väinämöinen, Odysseus, Kaguya-hime, Davy Crockett - another man who knew the value of a smart hat.

You wanna be a hero? Appearance is important. Cuchulainn is still most famous for his warp-spasm, a battle rage induced transformation in which his hair stood straight up in spikes and threw off sparks Dragon Ball Z style. Tomoe: the sexiest concubine which of course entails hime-hime hair. Väinämoinen looked unbelievably old and sported a wizard beard. I can’t really remember about Odysseus except that he was about as cut as most ancient Greeks. Kaguya-hime was a miniscule space princess. I don’t know what signaled space princessness to the feudal Japanese, but she probably looked like one of our more imaginative pop stars. With hime hair, of course. Davy Crockett: poorly tanned rawhide has an unforgettable smell.
Cuchulainn in full warp spasm. Each strand of hair can
spear an apple.
There are no apples in space.



I'd like to talk more about culture heroes because they are multidimensionally interesting. But that is for another post. And I'm going to pull the same trick with the cake!

The entire baking project is a spiced oatmeal cake with a maple custard filling, maple frosting, and a broiled coconut topping. It’s a lot of recipes to include in one post and a lot of work to do all at once, so here’s the custard and the frosting which can be made ahead and kept in the fridge for several days. The topping should be made at the same time as the cake, so look for those recipes in the following post about the ever mutable culture hero in literature and folk metal. I’m going to have to stick to dancing around in the forest with kanteles singing about bear hunts on this one, but if anyone can clue me into some Japanese folk metal about the perennially popular space princess or Amaterasu or even just the adventures of some tanuki, that would be great.
Three chia custard layers!

Maple Chia Seed Custard

Whisk together in a bowl:
2 Tablespoons chia seeds
1/6 cup maple syrup
3/6 cup soy, almond, or oat milk
(Achieve these weird measures painlessly by busting out your ⅓ cup measure, using it once for the milk, filling it to the halfway mark with maple syrup and then topping it off with the remaining milk. The idea is to get ⅔ cups of liquid including the flavoring.)

Whisk for a few minutes, let set for five to ten minutes, then whisk again. Repeat process until the seeds thicken to custard consistency.  This may take about an hour.


Maple Frosting

Beat together until smooth:
3 Tablespoons of margarine
1 1/2 cups of powdered sugar

Add in cautious parts up to ¼ cup of maple syrup until desired consistency is reached.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Chocolate Snack Cake

The high dude to sword ratio assures
quality.
Awhile back I ran the Seattle marathon, and it was a surprisingly peaceful experience.  Occult/Satanic black metal is a mixed bag, but at its best, it's quite soothing. Songs proceed steadily, have clean structures, and hit a sweet spot between overall simplicity and movements of complex, discordant riffs.  It goes well with extended study; perks up the mind but doesn't distract, pushes one through dense swaths of text with dreadful inertia, and creates a happy background atmosphere. For such reasons occult black metal also makes a great soundtrack for distance running. Leading up to the marathon, my time had been evenly split between running and studying Joyce's evolution of traditional features of Irish myth in Ulysses.  So, occult black metal has been in heavy rotation, and in terms of listens, Hade's Hecate Queen of Hades has been crowned a surprising but unambiguous victor.

The catchy bits and the more hilarious lyric passages replayed in my head for the better part of the marathon. Towards the last several miles, I couldn't keep up with the beat, but it set a great pace for the first 3/4ths of the race. The last quarter of the Seattle marathon is comprised of a series of hill climbs, which kept me busy imagining myself into a tardigrade anyhow. Tardigrades don't listen to music; they live underwater. They also have eight legs, a number which makes it markedly easier to run up hills, perhaps not quickly, but inevitably, like a microscopic, bear-shaped tank. The chitinous claws provide traction!

Several years back, ESA hosted a small program cutely named TARDIS in which tardigrades were shot into space completely unprotected from solar radiation. Aside from hunting amoebas and having armor plating, the cool thing about tardigrades is that they can survive an excess of 100 years when rolled up in an anhydrous tun. While secure in their desiccated tun-state, tardigrades can survive being boiled, frozen, thrown into acid, and, as it turns out, exposed to cosmic radiation. 12% of the micro-astronauts survived the flight and went on to have normal babies. What became of the percentage that survived but mutated, I wonder? how do you get weirder than a tardigrade?


Tardigrades: totally metal.
The Seattle course goes across Lake Washington and through a couple of parks. It rained the entire time, first a drizzle, then a downpour, then back to some characteristic spitting just in time for the finish. Windy too. COming north along the lakeshore into the second half of the race I saw some gorgeous flurries of the last of the sopping yellow alder leaves. Aside from transforming into a tardigrade and listening to an excellent mental soundtrack, the climate and the sections through these forested parks in the east of the city contributed to my overall feeling of well being and ease. It really felt like I was out for a nice trot the entire time despite pulling off speeds over distances that I hadn't thought myself capable of. The weather just felt right. The trees felt right. The air and the dirt smelled good.


Not alder leaves.
I'm not a particularly stationary person. I've popped up and down the west coast over the past ten years, and before that I wandered around the South Pacific. Though I don't always indulge it, I have the desire to move house about every six months. Yet I very much feel the Pacific Northwest to be my native habitat. Taking the Coast Starlight up from SF, there's a point after crossing the Siskiyous but before reaching Eugene where the plants change, get thicker and greener, and something in me that I didn't know was tight relaxes. It's like my mind has been holding its breath and suddenly takes a lungful of the cool, damp air.

Music can be place bound too. Of course Agalloch and other Cascadian black metal acts like Addaura or Alda (Is an A name an implicit requirement for this genre? Pretty sure I can list at least two more starting with the letter.) spring to mind. Kyuss sounds sometimes like the southwest. How is it hat musicians capture place in sound? It doesn't always work, or at least translate over to every person. Nothing of Sibelius's, not Finlandia, Karelia Suite, or his Sixth Symphony, feels like any part of Finland I've seen. But you wouldn't have to tell me the name of the band or song for me to imagine crouching beneath a wet spruce on a ridge in the Salmon Huckleberry Wilderness when I listen to Agalloch tunes. Though I've none of the desert in me, Kyuss, which I don't like on account of it, feels like getting slapped with dry sunshine.


Rather be slapped with this please.
Music hits straight to the core, the way the sight of plants in the weather does. Writers evoke place with varying success, but the effect is never as direct or moving through the filter of words. The immediate pleasurable pain of connection to a place transmits much more naturally through sound. Silently processing prose calls forth the mind. Music invites consciousness of self to melt out from the inside and disappear.


Somewhere around the 18th mile of a long run the same self dispersal begins. Water and wind carry me along. Trees take root and stretch out where my flesh had been. Flocks of geese get mixed up with my thoughts, seagulls with my feelings. But, I should note that I've only ever run longer distances west of the Cascades and north of Portland. Can I disappear into a habitat foreign to me? Can that be learned? I'm going to do some research.

Of course I wanted cake after running 26.2 miles fast. Become one with the landscape all you like, that's still a metric ass-ton of calories burned. So, here's an easy pleaser, chocolate cake with lemon frosting in the shape of a tardigrade. The neon food coloring enhances the flavor!
Eat effigy, assume tardigrade powers.


Chocolate Snack Cake

Oven at 176 C, 350 F.

Mix:
4 dl flour
60 ml cocoa
5 ml baking soda
2.5 ml salt


Melt on the stovetop:
2 dl packed brown sugar
60 grams of chocolate
80 ml margarine

Fold wet ingredients into dry,
then add:
2 dl + 40 ml water
5 ml vinegar
2.5 ml vanilla


Put into greased, floured pan(s) and bake 35-40 min.
Let cool before cutting into fanciful shapes (if desired) and frosting.
I used two 9 inch round cake pans and four cupcakes to create the tardigrade. But I was still stupid from running. On reflection, try four cupcakes and one 9x13.

Lemon Frosting

Cream together:
2 T margarine
1 C powdered sugar

Drizzle in lemon juice until desired consistency is achieved, about half a lemon.
Portion into cups and mix in food coloring.











Goodbye Seattle.